UNIFORM REPORTING OF TUBERCULOSIS IN EUROPE
Hans L. Rieder
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
A consensus conference held in Wolfheze, Netherlands, among participants
from the 51 countries of Europe agreed on uniform reporting criteria for cases
of tuberculosis in Europe (Eur Resp J 1996;9:1097-1104). The consensus
statement called for a uniform case definition, notifications based on
mandatory reporting for both laboratories and physicians, and a preference for
individual (as opposed to aggregate) case notifications. With the financial
support of the European Union, a project was launched to collect tuberculosis
notification data in a coordinating center which has now published the results
for three consecutive years. In the most recent report on cases notified in
1997, all but two of the 51 countries participated in the reporting according
to the guidelines. Nineteen reported individual data and 30 provided aggregate
data, the former group slowly increasing over the three-year period.
Notification rates ranged from 0 (in Monaco and San Marino) to 154 per 100,000
population (in Georgia) with a median of 154 per 100,000 population. In
general, notification rates tended to decrease compared to 1995 in those
countries with the lowest rates, and to increase in countries with rates of 50
per 100,000 and above. Particularly in Western Europe, the proportion of cases
identified among the foreign-born plays an increasing role with currently four
countries in which the proportion of these exceeds now 50 per cent of the
total.
This project demonstrates that both a political and technical will
exists in Europe to gather forces for improved surveillance; the data have
become comparable between countries for the first time in the history of
tuberculosis surveillance in Europe; an increasing number of countries is moving towards electronic
caption of data on individual cases. While EuropeÕs tuberculosis surveillance
system still lags more than a decade behind that of North America, the current
results have been achieved in a remarkably short period of time, particularly
considering the large cultural, economic and political differences between the
countries of Europe. They also suggest that the path chosen needs to be pursued
and strengthened further.